Progressive Faith Con Blog

July 15, 2006

Tools from Talking Tech Panel

Filed under: blogstuff - Pearlbear @ 8:43 pm

Here are the accumulated tools from the Saturday Morning Talkign Tech Panel, with Michelle Murrain (Pearlbear’s Blog,) Chris Walton, (Philocrites,) and Stephen Rockwell (CrossLeft.)

Blogging tools:

Promotion Tools:

Technorati

RSS Aggregators

Other Tools

  • Online Advocacy
  • del.icio.us - social bookmarking, subscribe to bookmarks
  • podcasting
  • tags/categories
  • Google Groups - for organizing groups of bloggers, etc.
  • Images
  • Design
  • Best promotion ideas

    • Media coverage
    • Google Rankings
    • progfaithblogcon list
    • media forums (nytimes.com washingtonpost.com)
    • traffic monitors (sitemeter)
    • cross posting

     

    More liveblogging links (updated!)

    Filed under: conference planning, blogstuff, community, faith, politics - Rachel @ 6:23 pm

    Lorianne at Hoarded Ordinaries posted a photo-illustrated piece about the weekend, starting with last night’s service and moving into the heart of today: Plugging in.

    Islamoyankee at Islamicate posted a hyperlinked list of good stuff from the Talking Tech panel, and some notes on the Faith and politics panel.

    Chris at Even the Devils Believe isn’t liveblogging per se — because he’s not here; he’s stuck in Paris! But he weighs in from afar

    And at Velveteen Rabbi, I posted a writeup of this morning’s meditation (both the learning, and the practice) called Buddhist meditation; a writeup of this afternoon’s "faith and politics" panel at Faith and politics; and a writeup of the International relations breakout, too.

     


    Technorati tags: progfaithblogcon.

    Roots and Branches irc log

    Filed under: conference planning, blogstuff, faith - Rachel @ 6:00 pm

    Pearlbear transcribed the first panel of the morning for us in the irc channel. (Thank you so so much!) We hope to have audio of all of the panels eventually too,  but for now, here’s our first chat transcript of the day…

    Jul 15 09:43:15 <pearlbear>    Panel #1 - Roots and Branches. Participants: Rachel Berenblat, introduces herself. Velveteen Rabbi is her blog
    <pearlbear>    Emily Ronald - research associate at the Pluralism Project at Harvard. Hussein Rashid (Islamicate) Ph.D. program at Harvard
    <pearlbear>    Islamicate, blog of issues related to Islam
    <pearlbear>    First, we’ll talk about pluralism, what it is, and isn’t
    <pearlbear>    Emily: Pluralism project - studying the diversity in the US. One of the definitions of pluralism - a guiding principle.
    <Rachel>    FYI, these quotes about pluralism are online here: http://www.islamicate.com/islamicate/2006/07/pfbc_pluralism.html
    <pearlbear>    In her work, Emily looks at the ways that sometimes we fail to come to grips with it - the challenges of pluralism
    <pearlbear>    Can also see the blessings of pluralism, such as the Katrina efforts, interfaith dialogue that is new, organizations that take interfaith approaches to the environment, or the workplace, or an art project
    <pearlbear>    www.pluralism.org, a lot of research and a directory of religious centers across the US
    <pearlbear>    challenges and blessings of pluralism comes from the fact that it is a process, which is ongoing.
    <pearlbear>    Rachel: talk about blogging community or communities. Are we one or many? How do we intersect? How are we interested in coming together?
    <pearlbear>    Question to audience: where are the different connections between our faith communities, and where do we want them to be?
    <pearlbear>    Hussein: Islamicate started in 2003. One of the first two substantive commenters on the blog - an episcopalian, and Rachel
    <pearlbear>    As they were trying to figure out who they were, and why they were different, they learned that they could be in a place to build bridges between different faiths
    <pearlbear>    Emphasis on the everyday interactions to keep conversations keeping.
    <pearlbear>    We read blogs of different traditions, so we are already building connections with each other
    <pearlbear>    Arthur: History of the connections are around, but we are in a new situation. Perhaps like 12th century Andalucia with a depth of connection.
    <pearlbear>    different religious traditions on the planet are like organs in a body. What are the connections?
    <pearlbear>    Two levels of connection: organs communicate directly with each other. The second: they all have their same DNA.
    <pearlbear>    What is it that’s the same DNA at the heart of all of our traditions. How does it unfolds in to difference?
    <pearlbear>    Chris Walton: Whether people interact with people who hold different theological views within their own traditions?
    <pearlbear>    Most people raised their hands
    <pearlbear>    How do we connect both between and within traditions
    <pearlbear>    Tim: It’s easier to talk across faith lines than to conservative Presbyterians, for instance because of the vitriol and conflict that is happening now
    <Xpatriated>    crucify them
    <Xpatriated>    ok, not really
    <pearlbear>    Thalia: Deep fracture inside Christianity. We struggle with what to do with the conservative Christians.
    <pearlbear>    Radical right: plague and scourge and heartbreak as a Christian
    <pearlbear>    Mik: Blogs tend to attract people of opposite views - to cause trouble and troll. Not terribly productive. On the other hand, how do we create forums that people who have different understandings can come together. Have folks had a good experience with that?
    <pearlbear>    At JSpot, there has been a good experience, more space to have that. In other places it seems that it is rarely a civil conversation.
    <pearlbear>    Chris Walton: Grew up a Mormon, now a Unitarian. Follows timesandseasons.org - largest Mormon blog in the world. Grew out of online conversations of 4 law students - conservative and center/left
    <pearlbear>    attracts very broad range of Mormon opinion. 4 original bloggers were committed to civil conservative engagement - so that the blog conversation stays civil
    <pearlbear>    In the Unitarian blogging community - some conversation between conservatives and others. Mormon blog is a good example.
    <pearlbear>    Steve Rockwell: Less concerned about having cross-political spectrum conversations right now. The left doesn’t have a well set agenda. We know what we are against, but not what we are for.
    <pearlbear>    Alot have pushed us to do the cross-political boundary stuff. We need to get together ourselves first, to figure out what we stand for, and then have these conversations.
    <pearlbear>    The emphasis, time spent should be on redefining the policies that we stand for, what are they now?
    <pearlbear>    Tim: He disagrees because there are so many evangelical conservative Chrisitans, some have never heard Christian ministers who have never affirmed a woman’s choice for an abortion, or equal treatment for gays and lesbians.
    <pearlbear>    They have been talking in their own echo chamber for so long, that they haven’t heard other voices.
    <pearlbear>    They haven’t had people from their own religious tradition speak back.
    <pearlbear>    We need those kinds of conversations.
    <pearlbear>    There is chaos within progressives about our message, but there are those who have never heard people speak against tax cuts, or the war - having that contact can be transformational
    <pearlbear>    Tim: Christian Alliance for Progress
    <pearlbear>    http://blog01.kintera.com/christianalliance/
    <pearlbear>    Lorianne: Are we talking about going to radical right blog and attracting notice, or are we relying on Google? How much are we going out, how much are we letting people find us?
    <pearlbear>    Thurman: He has suggested to people not to engage the religious right - it will attract hard right commenters
    <pearlbear>    There are 10 to 20 readers to each commenters. There are people on the right we will never convince. But there is a large middle part of america we can reach
    <pearlbear>    Bruce Prescott: Never had to invite the right to my site - they just come. Like electronic graffiti - try to refute everything you said.
    <pearlbear>    Dialogue between the readers. We are first trying to just find each other. Progressives of a variety of traditions.
    <pearlbear>    the other side has taken over the public domain, and we don’t have a voice.
    <pearlbear>    They dominate the airwaves, there is not enough $ in the progressive community to buy up the communications abilities they have
    <pearlbear>    What kind of a nation are we going to be? Are we going to be pluralistic?  Only way is to work on the internet. We have to find each other first, then find a way to communicate that message more carefully and thoughtfully.
    <pearlbear>    Thalia: Beliefnet - a place where a lot of people discuss that. Can the progressive community make a liason with a place like Beliefnet - why not make a connection to that instead of reinventing the wheel
    <pearlbear>    How many have posted on Beliefnet? A few raised their hands.
    <pearlbear>    Nathan: progressive statesman. There is a good agenda on economic justice. Someone who is in the unchurched nonfaith community. Hear too much about tolerance. Not recruiting.
    <pearlbear>    The religious right recruits, the religious left does not.
    <pearlbear>    People who go to church most often didn’t used to vote right wing
    <pearlbear>    Who is talking to them? When you have a conversation - what is the arguments that connect people, and will draw people in?
    <pearlbear>    Engaging the hard right is diverting you from your goal. How do you gain people from the margins?
    <pearlbear>    Omar Sayed: Muslimwakeup.com progressivemeetup.com(?)
    <pearlbear>    First - organize amongst ourselves and come up with a strategy.
    <pearlbear>    Then, once we are know how to approach it, make conversations. Start with moderates.
    <pearlbear>    Two issues: gender - Mixed gender prayer lead by a woman. Lots of press, death threats, demonstrators. And the gay rights issue.
    <pearlbear>    Demonstrators are too radical to engage.
    <pearlbear>    Hussein: Within each community, issues are a little different
    <pearlbear>    conversation is happening with moderates
    <pearlbear>    Extremism in the Muslim tradition both left and right - what does it mean to be liberal? Where do we situate the text, and how do we use the text to move forward?
    <pearlbear>    Arguments put forward are textually based. Progressive label is a contentious issue among Muslims right now - fracturing this community, like it is fracturing many communities
    <pearlbear>    Rachel: this conversation must continue - at lunch, on our blogs - the friendships we make here can help sustain this conversation.
    <pearlbear>    What are our roots, and where can our branches grow?
     

    Coming to you live from Montclair!

    Filed under: conference planning, blogstuff, community, faith, politics - Rachel @ 5:19 pm

    A bunch of us are liveblogging the conference; here’s an attempt to round up liveblogged posts so far.

    Posts at Velveteen Rabbi:

    - Friday

    - Roots and Branches

    - J-blogosphere breakout

    - Blogging Scripture

    - all conference posts: here

    Posts at Islamicate:

    - Pluralism

    - Beginnings

    - Blogging text

    Posts at Mainstream Baptist:

    - Panel about community

    - Faith affiliation breakouts

    Posts at Faith in Public Life:

    - Blog con on

    - Talking About Our World

    Posts at Pearlbear’s Blog:

    - Blog Con, Day 1.

    (She also spent the early part of the morning transcribing everything everyone said for the irc channel — yay and thankyou! We’ll post a link to that soon too.)

    If you’re blogging the conference, let us know and we’ll do our best to add your posts to this list in realtime…

    Technorati tags: progfaithblogcon.

    Blog Con in the press!

    Filed under: conference planning - Rachel @ 3:39 pm

    The New Jersey Jewish News ran an article about our con!

    Religion, liberalism, and Web savvy are the watchwords of the first Progressive Faith Blog Con, a convention to be held over the July 14 weekend in the Conference Center at Montclair State University.

    Jews and Christians, Buddhists and Muslims, and at least one self-proclaimed pagan will gather to continue in person the kinds of conversations they wage on-line as authors of blogs, the Web diaries that range from the queasily personal to the politically influential…

    You can read the article here: On-line religious liberals plan meeting for Montclair. [x-posted from Velveteen Rabbi]

    Technorati tags: progfaithblogcon.

    Good morning! and irc

    Filed under: Uncategorized - Rachel @ 12:40 pm

    The irc channel is open, so if you’re online today and want to hang out, please do; just go to freenode.net and join channel #progfaithblogcon (per the instructions here.)

    We’re about to begin morning meditation, so the channel may be quiet for a while yet, but I wanted to let y’all know that it’s there! 

    Opening Remarks at the BlogCon

    Filed under: Uncategorized - Thurman @ 3:29 am

    Namaste. Shalom. Salaam. Merry Meet. And welcome brothers and sisters. Ladies and Gentlemen, people of all faiths, welcome to the inaugural edition of the Progressive Faith Bloggers Conference.

    When I first reached out to Rachel six months ago to find out if this idea of mine would work or if I were simply deranged, I found a workmate that has time and again proven resourceful, wise, and wonderful in every way. I dont know what this would have been like without her efforts, but it certainly would have been much harder for me to put together. From the bottom of my heart, I thank you.

    The two of us began contacting people in a rather naïve fashion searching blogs for email links and sending blunt invitations. To our surprise and great pleasure,it seemed that everyone we contacted wanted to be involved. That you are all here today is a testament to the ability of such men and women as Mik Moore, David Buckley, Kety Esquivel, and many others to live the embodiment of their faith. They had the faith and the drive to breathe life into this idea and they brought the organizational skills and resources with them that, as my wife will vigorously agree, I sorely lack.

    So we are here today, poised on the edge of history. About a hundred and forty years ago, groups much like this one met to create a national society for the abolition of slavery. Informed and motivated largely by their faith in God and their sense of social injustice, they joined forces to right one of the greatest wrongs ever perpetrated on this continent. They didnt have blogs back then, so they started newspapers, they wrote pamphlets and novels and plays, they barnstormed the north and mid-west speaking wherever they could find a crowd. Sometimes they were ridden out of town on arail for their efforts. Their printing presses were destroyed and thrown in the river. Some of them lost their lives.

    I dont believe that the issues facing our society today match up to that of slavery. I wont demean that horrible crime nor slight the efforts of the abolitionists by using a direct comparison. Yet there are similarities. We are here because, for far too long, the public voice of faith in America has been too narrow, too harsh, too exclusive.

    Like many of you, I have grown tired of hearing my faith attached to issues that I find to be tangential, positions that I find untenable, and to a vitriolic glee that I find unholy. I find myself unable to remain on the sidelines, quietly working to lead by example alone. When I began looking for someone to speak for me publicly, I found myself again and again looking into the mirror. As imperfect a tool as I saw looking back at me, it was the only tool I had at my disposal.

    I wont pretend to speak for the entire group about why you are here or why you write or what you hope to accomplish. But that is why I am here. I am here because there is work to be done and I am capable of doing it. I am here because one day the two children growing inside my wife will look to their father and decide for themselves whether or not he is the kind of man they want to emulate, whether he has spoken empty words or whether he has been a living example of what he preaches. Im here because I must be here.

    Im also here because I need you. Man was not made to live alone, and it is through our friends and family, our community that we see our true selves. We can feel empathy, but until we reach out to another, it is a useless emotion. So we come here, not to reduce our faith to a lowest common denominator, but to celebrate our diversity and to learn to understand so that our love for each other may abound and grow.

    But we also come here so that we can move forward. I said long ago that it would be a victory to pull off such a conference but I understand now that it is only a small victory. There is much work to do in a world that is literally starving to death for want of spiritual sustenance. Its here in the broken homes and the empty eyes of the street youth of America as much as it is in the hungry stare of famine-stricken Africa or wore-torn Asia.

    So our purpose here is complete, in one sense, just by being here tonight. And I will not charge you to set aside the fellowship and spiritual nourishment offered in order to chart the future. I willsimply ask that at some time this weekend, you consider what is needed from this group. If it is only a day or two of fellowship, then I would say it is too much time and money and effort to do again and again. But if we have a larger purpose, if we have a larger communion, if we have an unfilled need, then we have a calling to answer. No voice is too small to be heard and no need is too great to address.

    For all things, there is truly a time. Tonight is our time to worship, to join in fellowship, and to forge the bonds of affection that will allow us to do the work we begin tomorrow. So I say to you, in way of closing:

    Namaste. Shalom. Salaam. Merry Meet. And welcome brothers and sisters. Ladies and Gentlemen, people of all faiths, welcome to YOUR Progressive Faith Bloggers Conference.

    The blog con has begun!

    Filed under: conference planning, faith - Rachel @ 1:51 am

    Hello from the beautiful conference center at Montclair State University!

    The blog con has begun: tonight Thurman made some beautiful opening remarks (which I hope he’ll post here eventually) and then I led an erev Shabbat (Sabbath eve) service with Harriet’s exquisite melodic help.

    I posted the siddur (prayerbook) from that service, with a few explanatory notes, here at my blog.

    We’ll try to update this blog regularly throughout the weekend with links to people’s posts; if you’re liveblogging the conference, let us know!

    Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
    Theme designed by Alex King